<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Kommentarer til: Ældre søskende er de klogeste</title>
	<atom:link href="http://macand.dk/blog/%c3%a6ldre-s%c3%b8skende-er-de-klogeste/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://macand.dk/blog/%c3%a6ldre-s%c3%b8skende-er-de-klogeste/</link>
	<description>www.macand.dk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 14:12:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Af: URL</title>
		<link>http://macand.dk/blog/%c3%a6ldre-s%c3%b8skende-er-de-klogeste/comment-page-1/#comment-1872</link>
		<dc:creator>URL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 00:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macand.dk/blog/?p=23#comment-1872</guid>
		<description>I simply must tell you that you have written an excellent and unique article that I really enjoyed reading.  I?m fascinated by how well you laid out your material and presented your views.  Thank you. 820076</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I simply must tell you that you have written an excellent and unique article that I really enjoyed reading.  I?m fascinated by how well you laid out your material and presented your views.  Thank you. 820076</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Af: Ã†ldste sÃ¸skende er klogest</title>
		<link>http://macand.dk/blog/%c3%a6ldre-s%c3%b8skende-er-de-klogeste/comment-page-1/#comment-1510</link>
		<dc:creator>Ã†ldste sÃ¸skende er klogest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macand.dk/blog/?p=23#comment-1510</guid>
		<description>[...] har skrevet om dette fÃ¸r i et tidligere blog-indlÃ¦g, men sÃ¸rme om der ikke er kommet endnu en undersÃ¸gelse, som konkluderer, at fÃ¸rstefÃ¸dte bliver [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] har skrevet om dette fÃ¸r i et tidligere blog-indlÃ¦g, men sÃ¸rme om der ikke er kommet endnu en undersÃ¸gelse, som konkluderer, at fÃ¸rstefÃ¸dte bliver [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Af: Knud</title>
		<link>http://macand.dk/blog/%c3%a6ldre-s%c3%b8skende-er-de-klogeste/comment-page-1/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Knud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 19:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macand.dk/blog/?p=23#comment-119</guid>
		<description>Klart rigtigt......

Tak for sidst iÃ¸vrigt........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Klart rigtigt&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>Tak for sidst iÃ¸vrigt&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Af: Toasten</title>
		<link>http://macand.dk/blog/%c3%a6ldre-s%c3%b8skende-er-de-klogeste/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Toasten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 17:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://macand.dk/blog/?p=23#comment-82</guid>
		<description>Der er ikke noget nyt i, at Ã¦ldre sÃ¸skende er de klogeste. Det har vi storesÃ¸stre altid vidst! Undrer mig bare over undersÃ¸gelsens kÃ¸ns-ensidighed. Men de mandlige forskere er mÃ¥ske bange for at finde ud af, at der ville vÃ¦re 100% overlegenhed, i stedet for 57%, hvis de tog sÃ¸strene med?!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Der er ikke noget nyt i, at Ã¦ldre sÃ¸skende er de klogeste. Det har vi storesÃ¸stre altid vidst! Undrer mig bare over undersÃ¸gelsens kÃ¸ns-ensidighed. Men de mandlige forskere er mÃ¥ske bange for at finde ud af, at der ville vÃ¦re 100% overlegenhed, i stedet for 57%, hvis de tog sÃ¸strene med?!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

